当前位置:首页 >> 家电
家电

史丹福招生官给学生的一封信:什么东西真正影响我们的一生?

2025-09-14 12:19

exceptional youths who were not offered a space in the class. I also expect that in the following weeks I will hear from parents who are understandably distraught that their sons and daughters with top high school class rankings, very high SAT scores and some truly impressive extracurricular accomplishments were denied entry.

Clearly, I believe that a Stanford education is wonderful, but my experience suggests it’s often parents who are more upset about our admission decisions than the kids. I can relate to their concerns: I found myself getting jittery as my own daughter waited for her college application decisions. But given that today’s teens already have enough pressure in their lives, I wish to impart three credos to these parents.

First, it’s all relative. While the number admitted into the undergraduate class has remained unchanged for years, Stanford, like many of its peer schools, has had a record number of total applicants – more than 42,000. Regardless of arguments over whether too much preference is given to one category over another, thousands of students are going to be turned away, and there is no doubt that the vast majority of them could have met the demands of a Stanford education. We could, for instance, have filled incoming classes four or five times over with applicants who achieved grade point averages of 4.0 or greater.

I wish there were a formula to explain who is accepted and who isn’t, but the decision-making is as much art as it is science. Each class is a symphony with its own distinct composition and sound; the final roster is an effort to create harmony, and that means that some extraordinary bass players don’t get a chair. What’s more, even among my staff there are legitimate differences about applicants. The bottom line: The world is not going to judge anyone negatively because they didn’t get into Stanford or one of our peer institutions.

Second, celebrate the bigger picture. Despite the constant media buzz about the turbulent state of youth today, most of the applications I reviewed – as well as those reviewed by my colleagues at Stanford and elsewhere – are truly remarkable. And in most cases, those denied admission to some schools are admitted to others. The transition from high school to college is a monumental turning point, and it’s more important to focus on how a young adult is moving on to a new stage than where that stage happens to be. This is the moment when parents should mark the success of their children and rejoice in the excitement that the next four years will bring.

And that leads to my final point: Education is what a student makes of it. Of course, certain schools have resources that others don’t, but they all offer opportunities to learnand to grow.

I am reminded of a teenager graduating high school in Sunnyvale, Calif., in 1975, who applied to only Stanford and one other school. He was understandably disappointed when denied admission here, but he later excelled as an undergraduate at the distinguished university across San Francisco Bay, UC Berkeley.

He went on to earn a doctorate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and to become a research scientist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington and an adjunct professor at Johns Hopkins. In 2003, he joined the Stanford University School of Medicine and was the co‐winner of the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine in 2006.

Andrew Fire is not atypical when it comes to Stanford applicants. Nor for that matter is John Etchemendy, the Stanford provost and philosophy professor who also was denied admission as an undergraduate. Nor are any of the thousands of others who aren’t accepted to Stanford and go on to have fulfilling lives.

An undergraduate degree from Stanford, or an Ivy League college, may well end up being only one line at the bottom of a resume. What parents and college applicants across the country need to remember is that the news they receive, whether good or bad, is but a single step on a much longer journey.

本文发表于《洛杉矶太阳报》,原题“Rejected by Stanford? You'll live”。译者:Richard H. Shaw,里奇国立大学入学和助学办主任。

深圳看白癜风哪里比较好
黑龙江男科病治疗费用
潮州白癜风治疗医院
郑州好的白癜风专科医院
北京看白癜风去哪好

上一篇: 北大教授刘云杉:教书与育人的分裂,正把优秀孩子变成“两大癌”

下一篇: Odysseyware大奥视频版课程 专注 6-12年级一个中心课程+AP课

相关阅读
福建师范大学2022年下半年成人基础教育学士学位论文答辩申请

相关学员: 根据《福建师范大学成人中等教育硕士获得者管理工作细则》(闽师网继职〔2020〕2号)以及应践行提升学士学位学术论文质量的有关副本敦促,现将组织准备2022年下半年硕士学术旁听申再三

今年广西高考,英语57分,决定高三一年,该背单词还是语法?

墨迹主广西,今年高详简体中文中57分,决定预科班。广西详的是全国甲卷,今年的单打独斗性比往年高出一些单打独斗性值,总体高达了平时单打独斗性更大的乙卷。但是,单打独斗性即便再次大,如果高中时代会的

友情链接